The art world is a vast and ever-evolving landscape, encompassing a wide range of styles, movements, and mediums. However, one of the most debated and highly contentious topics within this world is the classification of applied arts. For decades, there has been an ongoing debate surrounding whether applied arts should be considered on the same level as fine arts, or if they should be placed in a separate category altogether. In this article, we will delve into this debate and provide insight into both sides of the argument, with practical examples to support each perspective.

First, let us define applied arts. Applied arts refer to the application of design and decorative elements to everyday objects, such as furniture, pottery, textiles, or even architecture. These objects are often functional and created for practical use, rather than solely for aesthetic appreciation. On the other hand, fine arts refer to forms of art that are solely created for their aesthetic value, such as painting, sculpture, or installation art.

Those who advocate for the classification of applied arts within the art world argue that these objects possess equal artistic merit as fine arts. They argue that just like fine art, applied arts require specialized technical skills and creativity to create. For example, a beautifully crafted piece of furniture can be seen as a work of art in its own right. The intricate details and design, as well as the craftsmanship, involved in creating such a piece, require a high level of skill and creativity. Additionally, proponents of this stance argue that applied arts have just as much potential for emotional and intellectual impact as fine arts. For instance, many textiles tell stories and carry cultural significance, making them not just functional objects but also carriers of meaning and artistic expression.

Moreover, proponents of this perspective believe that by separating applied arts from fine arts, we limit the scope of the art world and exclude a significant portion of creative work. They argue that art is not just limited to traditional forms such as painting or sculpture, but it can also exist in functional objects. By acknowledging applied arts as a legitimate form of art, we open up the field to different perspectives, techniques, and possibilities.

On the other hand, those who advocate for the separation of applied arts from fine arts argue that applied arts serve a different purpose and have different principles from traditional forms of art. They argue that applied arts focus more on functionality and practicality, rather than purely aesthetic value. For instance, a chair may be beautifully designed and crafted, but its primary purpose is to be sat on, not to be admired as a piece of art.

Additionally, those who support this perspective argue that by merging applied arts with fine arts, we risk diluting the value and impact of traditional art forms. Fine arts have a rich history and tradition, and by placing them on the same level as applied arts, we may diminish their significance and importance in the art world.

Furthermore, separating applied arts from fine arts can also have practical benefits. It allows for a clearer categorization and understanding of different art forms, making it easier for curators, critics, and collectors to navigate the art world. It can also prevent confusion and competition within the industry, as artists and designers can focus on their respective fields without feeling the need to adhere to the norms and standards of the other.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the classification of applied arts in the art world is complex and ongoing. While some argue for their inclusion within the realm of fine arts, others believe that they should be placed in a separate category. Both perspectives have valid points and examples to support their stance. Ultimately, the classification of applied arts may be a matter of personal opinion, and the boundaries between different art forms may continue to blur and evolve as the art world progresses. However, what is certain is that both fine and applied arts require skill, creativity, and passion, and should be appreciated and recognized for their unique contributions to the art world.